ISSN 1016-5169 | E-ISSN 1308-4488
pdf
Central Sensitization Drives Symptom Burden in Microvascular Angina: A Cross-Sectional Case-Control Study-Uncorrected Proof [Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars]
Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars. Ahead of Print: TKDA-93273 | DOI: 10.5543/tkda.2025.93273

Central Sensitization Drives Symptom Burden in Microvascular Angina: A Cross-Sectional Case-Control Study-Uncorrected Proof

Hüseyin Tezcan1, Kadri Murat Gürses1, Muhammed Ulvi Yalçın1, Yasin Özen1, Bülent Behlül Altunkeser1, Nazif Aygül1, Kenan Demir1, Abdullah Tunçez1, Esra Şen Bülbül1, Ezgi Akyıldız Tezcan2
1Department of Cardiology, Konya Selcuk University Medical Faculty Hospital, Konya, Türkiye
2Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Selcuk University Faculty of Medicine, Konya, Türkiye


OBJECTIVE
Microvascular angina (MVA), a phenotype of ischemia with non obstructive coronary arteries, produces chest pain despite normal epicardial vessels. Central sensitization (CS) may amplify symptoms, but its magnitude in confirmed MVA is unclear.


METHOD
We conducted a single center cross sectional study. Adults with MVA undergoing coronary angiography and age‑ and sex matched healthy volunteers completed the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and chest pain questionnaires. MVA required documented ischemia with ≤ 50% epicardial stenosis. The primary outcome was the difference in mean CSI score; secondary outcomes were the proportion with CSI ≥ 40 and correlations between CSI, angina measures, and HADS subscores.


RESULTS
We enrolled 200 participants; 138 (69%) were male; and the mean age was 61 ± 11 years. Mean CSI‑Part A was higher in MVA versus controls (43 ± 15 vs. 19 ± 11; P < 0.001), and clinically significant CS was more prevalent (62% vs. 10%). Within MVA, CSI correlated with chest pain intensity (r = 0.58), weekly episode frequency (r = 0.46), HADS‑Anxiety (r = 0.51), and HADS‑Depression (r = 0.44) (all P < 0.001). In adjusted models, each 10‑point increase in CSI was associated with a 0.47 standard deviation rise in pain score (β = 0.47, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.29–0.64; P < 0.001); the model explained 39% of pain‑score variance (R² = 0.39).


CONCLUSION
Central sensitization is highly prevalent and strongly linked to angina burden in MVA, supporting a heart brain contribution to symptom generation. Interventions that reduce central pain amplification may provide meaningful benefit beyond standard anti ischemic therapy.

Keywords: Central sensitization, chest pain amplification, coronary microvascular dysfunction, ischemia with non‑, obstructive coronary arteries (INOCA), microvascular angina

Corresponding Author: Hüseyin Tezcan
Manuscript Language: English
×
APA
NLM
AMA
MLA
Chicago
Copied!
CITE


Journal Metrics

Journal Citation Indicator: 0.18
CiteScore: 1.1
Source Normalized Impact
per Paper:
0.22
SCImago Journal Rank: 0.348

Quick Search

Copyright © 2025 Archives of the Turkish Society of Cardiology



Kare Publishing is a subsidiary of Kare Media.