ISSN 1016-5169 | E-ISSN 1308-4488
pdf
Evaluation of Procedure Doses and Staff Attitudes in Interventional Cardiology in Terms of Radiation Safety [Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars]
Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars. Ahead of Print: TKDA-18363 | DOI: 10.5543/tkda.2024.18363

Evaluation of Procedure Doses and Staff Attitudes in Interventional Cardiology in Terms of Radiation Safety

Uğur Uğrak1, Yusuf Uzkar2, İrfan Düzen3, Temel Acar4, Ercan Karabey5, Gülperi Durmaz2
1Department of Health Management, University of Health Sciences, Gülhane Vocational School of Health, Ankara, Türkiye
2Department of Radiology, Gaziantep Ersin Arslan Training and Research Hospital, Gaziantep, Türkiye
3Department of Cardiology, Gaziantep Ersin Arslan Training and Research Hospital, Gaziantep, Türkiye
4Department of Cardiology, Bursa Medical Faculty Health Application and Research Center Hospital, Bursa, Türkiye
5Department of Cardiology, Sivas Cumhuriyet University Research and Application Hospital, Sivas, Türkiye


BACKGROUND
Ionizing radiation has been used for years in the medical field. As one of the areas, the catheter laboratories (cath labs) have been accepted as a field where radiation exposure was reasonably high. This study aims to examine the radiation levels exposed during different interventional procedures to raise awareness of this issue in Türkiye.

METHODS
This study evaluated procedure radiation dose (n=2804) in the cath labs of four public hospitals with different characteristics. Radiation dose evaluation was conducted with Cumulative Air Kerma (CAK). The Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Kruskal Wallis H, the independent T-test, and The Pearson correlation coefficient were used to present the findings. p<0.05 was accepted as statistically significant. IBM® SPSS® STATISTIC Version 26.0.0.0 (Corporation, Armonk, New York, United States of America (USA) was used to analyze the data.

RESULTS
Procedure radiation doses in the cath labs were presented in this study. The findings were mainly consistent with the literature. Additionally, many outlier cases were determined with quite high radiation doses [CAK (min-max) = 0.12 – 9.9 Gy]. Chronic total occlusion (CTO) [Mean CAK: 3.8(±1.5) Gy] and percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) [Mean CAK: 1.5(±1.4) Gy] were procedures with high doses. Moreover, personnel attitudes toward radiation optimization in the cath labs were insufficient.

CONCLUSION
The rates of high radiation exposure during interventional procedures may be higher than expected in Türkiye. Further studies are warranted to investigate the predictors and the preventive measures to reduce these rates. For this purpose, diagnostic radiation reference (DRL) levels can be established to monitor national radiation levels.

Keywords: Patient safety, radiation protection, cath lab., health policy

How to cite this article


Corresponding Author: Uğur Uğrak
Manuscript Language: English


Journal Metrics

Journal Citation Indicator: 0.18
CiteScore: 1.1
Source Normalized Impact
per Paper:
0.22
SCImago Journal Rank: 0.348

Quick Search

Copyright © 2024 Archives of the Turkish Society of Cardiology



Kare Publishing is a subsidiary of Kare Media.